German Research Foundation
2017 to 2020
The research project is embedded in the larger Research Group “International Public Administrations. Emergence and Development of Administrative Patterns and their Effects on International Policy-Making”, which was funded by the German Research Foundation from 2014 to 2017 and will now be extended to 2020. The research group brings together more than 20 researchers from Public Administration and International Relations in 7 sub-projects. They are concerned with the question whether, to what extent and how different administrative patterns of international public administrations impact on national and international policy-making. International public administrations (also labelled international bureaucracies or secretariats of international organizations) are collective entities that form a distinct but integral organizational part of intergovernmental organizations and are run by non-elected officials or international civil servants, e.g. the Secretariat of the United Nations. Starting from the results of the first phase, the different research projects analyse the impact of administrative styles, autonomy, expert knowledge, time rules and time horizons and modes of multi-level coordination. In doing so, different theoretical perspectives from Public Administration and International Relations are applied.
German Research Foundation
2017 to 2020
Starting point, research questions and goals
The research project seeks to answer the following question:
- Whether, when and how does the expert authority of international bureaucracies affect decisions in states to voluntarily follow the policy advice of international bureaucracies?
International bureaucracies are thus analysed as actors with independent influence and more precisely as agents of non-hierarchical policy transfers. If states do voluntarily follow the advice of international bureaucracies, for example by adopting policies, establishing administrative arrangements or creating institutions, this is best captured as successful and voluntary policy transfers from international bureaucracies to states. Policy transfer is typically understood as process in which knowledge about policies, administrative arrangements or institutions from one organisation is used in the development of policies, administrative arrangements or institutions in another organisation. Thus, the underlying, more general question is whether and to what effect international bureaucracies act as agents of policy transfer and contribute to national and international governance without the use of hierarchical means, namely legal means (e.g. the enforcement of collectively binding agreements) or coercive means (e.g. conditionality).
These questions bring together different theoretical and analytical lenses in the study of international bureaucracies and policy transfer and are derived from three insights in related research. First of all, research on international bureaucracies revealed that they can be conceptualised as actors with independent influence and suggested that they also impact on domestic policymaking. Moreover, this research regards expert authority as major source of their independent influence. Second, research on policy transfer and diffusion showed that international organisations are important agents of non-hierarchical policy transfers and that policy transfer and diffusion can be used by global governance actors in order to coordinate domestic policies. Third, the research in the first phase of the research group revealed that attributions of expert authority vary across international bureaucracies, policy areas and states. The latter finding in combination with the other findings begged the question whether cross-national variations in attributions of expert authority to international bureaucracies affect their effects as agents of non-hierarchical policy transfers.
The research design is x-centred and combines quantitative and qualitative research methods in the comparative analysis of the OECD and the World Bank and their activities in financial and agricultural policy. In the first of the three interrelated analytical phases, the project employ statistical analysis and measure the effects of (varying levels of) expert authority on access of international bureaucracies to national policy-makers, because this may be the first step in a causal pathway from expert authority to successful policy transfer. In the second phase, the project will use a survey and cross-case comparisons in order to identify the extent to and conditions under which expert authority facilitates policy transfers. In the third phase, process-tracing case studies in four countries will be used in order to study causal mechanisms of policy transfers by international bureaucracies.
From an academic perspective, this research contributes in several ways to three research strands. It contributes to the study of international organisations 1) by directing the attention to international bureaucracies as holders of authority within international organisations, 2) by focusing on expert authority as specific authority type, and 3) by focusing on consequences of expert authority. It contributes to the study of international bureaucracies by 1) by directing the attention to their influence on domestic policymaking, and 2) by singling out expert authority as potential source of their independent influence. Finally, it contributes to research on international organisations as agents of policy transfer 1) by singling out the role of international bureaucracies and their contribution to policy transfers, and 2) by assessing and accounting for the consequences of their expert authority on their potential to act as agents of policy transfers. Overall, this research may improve and further differentiate our understanding of the influence and effects of international bureaucracies.
From a policy perspective, this research may contribute to a better understanding of the potential of international bureaucracies to create international order through voluntary policy transfers. For example, if international bureaucracies are successful in transferring policies to a greater number of states, the sum of individual and voluntary adoptions may cumulate to international order in the sense of cross-national policy clusters and prepare the ground for collectively binding international agreements. These possible effects may be a welcome complement to international governance in times when other modes of international governance, such as multilateral negotiations on collectively binding decisions, are deadlocked or (doomed to) fail, or in case of conditionality are increasingly contested and challenged.
Heinzel, Mirko, Jonas Richter, Per-Olof Busch, Hauke Feil, Jana Herold & Andrea Liese (2020) Birds of a feather? The determinants of impartiality perceptions of the IMF and the World Bank, Review of International Political Economy (online first), DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2020.1749711
Liese, Andrea (2020): Autorität in den Internationalen Beziehungen. Reflexionen über die reflexive Autorität in Michael Zürns Schriften, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 27:1, 99-111, DOI: 10.5771/0946-7165-2020-1-99
Per-Olof Busch und Andrea Liese (2017), The Authority of International Public Administrations, in: Michael W. Bauer, Christoph Knill and Steffen Eckhard (Hrsg.), International Bureaucracy. Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 97-122.
Mehr Informationen bei Palgrave Macmillan
- Dr. Per-Olof Busch (Leader)
Prof. Dr. Andrea Liese (Leader)
Mirko Heinzel, MSc (Researcher)
Mathies Kempken, MA (Researcher)