Dino Leopardi, DOME researcher from the HZDR/TU Freiberg, and his co-authors published a paper in Geochemistry in which they present amazing age data obtained from cassiterites within the Sadisdorf mineralization located in the Erzgebirge. The open-access paper “LA-ICP-MS U-Pb cassiterite age data of the Sadisdorf deposit link Sn-Li-(W-Cu) mineralization in the eastern Erzgebirge to the collapse of the Altenberg-Teplice Caldera” can be found here. The Sadisdorf prospect consists of four intrusive stages of which the youngest alkali-feldspar microgranite porphyry hosts relevant mineralizations. The prospect is divided into two sites, one centered on the microgranite (Kupfergrube) with greisen and stockwork mineralization within the endo- and exocontact and one to the SE with vein and stockwork-style mineralization (Zinnklüfte) albeit fewer ore minerals. Cassiterite and wolframite occur disseminated within the massive quartz-topaz-mica greisen bodies whereas the stockwork style mineralization shows quartz-mica-topaz veinlets with early Sn and W oxide and late sulfides. Although previously inferred to be related to two distinct mineralizing events, Dino and his Co-authors present a rather narrow time range for both types. Their results are based on 16 samples from the Sadisdorf system which allowed a more detailed evaluation compared to the previous investigation. With this approach, it was possible to evaluate the age consistency and further contextualize the timing of ore formation within the regional/province scale. 20 unaltered domains within these cassiterites were chosen resulting in in-situ dates of the Kupfergrube and Zinnklüfte sites ranging from 311 to 315 Ma but overlapping in general. This points towards the mentioned coeval formation and relation to one magmatic-hydrothermal event.

The new paper by Nicolas Meyer (DOME researcher at the University of Tübingen) gives an amazing insight into the evolution of a magmatic-hydrothermal skarn vein deposit in the Erzgebirge. He and his co-authors published their research in Mineralium Deposita with the title “Timing and origin of skarn‑, greisen‑, and vein‑hosted tin mineralization at Geyer, Erzgebirge (Germany) “. The Geyer mining district is located in the western part of the Erzgebirge and its mineralization comprises different styles of mineralization including tin-bearing skarns, greisen, and veins in which the cassiterite is the main ore mineral. The authors provide a detailed petrographic description of the ore deposit and are further using fluid inclusions microthermometry and LA-ICP-MS geochronology to decipher the formation of the deposit. The microscopic analysis of a set of 60 samples already provides a paragenetic sequence that points towards two formation stages of which the first stage is a skarn alteration with no tin occurrence. The second magmatic stage consists of a complex skarn and greisen alteration followed by late-stage veins. Cassiterite is present in all these different mineralizing events. These petrographic observations are in line with the U-Pb age dating results made by Nicolas and his co-authors. The obtained ages in garnet clearly show these two stages with ages of ~322 Ma for the first stage and 307 to 301 Ma for the garnet in the second stage supported by cassiterite ages of 308 to 305 Ma preserved in the veins. This points towards a common magmatic-hydrothermal event responsible for the ore-forming event. Within this second stage, the tin is mainly precipitated by cooling and dilution of the magmatic-hydrothermal fluid by meteoric fluids as shown by the fluid inclusion data.

DOME researcher Dominic Gudelius and his co-authors published a paper in the Journal of Petrology and compared alkaline complexes in Greenland (Gardiner) and Russia (Kovdor). In these alkaline complexes, ultramafic rocks can occur together with carbonatites and melilitolites and can contain different types of HFSE (high-field strength element) mineralization. Therefore, Gudelius et al. analyzed these rather similar successions of rocks but found evidence that the formation can be rather different. In the Gardiner complex, the ultramafic rocks originate from primitive mantle-derived melts and therefore show e.g. cumulate textures or Ni-rich forsterite. The parental melts in Gardiner were extracted from a weakly oxidized (Sr-, F-, Ti-rich) mantle and experienced long-lasting differentiation therefore forming the carbonatites, foidolites, etc. The ultramafic rocks of the Kovdor complex are the product of metasomatic interaction between dolomitic mantle-derived carbonatite magma and diverse crustal host rocks. Here, no cumulate structures can be found. However, a subsuite of samples of Kovdor shows these cumulate structures pointing towards the possibility that these two processes (cumulate-derived ultramafic rock formation and formation by carbonate metasomatism) can happen simultaneously. The results of the paper further indicate that the parental magmas should derive from a Ti (+HFSE) enriched mantel to form HFSE enrichments early in the magma evolution as well and high F contents in the melt facilitate HFSE mobilization. Depending on the magma evolution, carbonatites can be enriched or depleted in the late-stage carbonatites. Therefore, a characterization of the ultramafic rocks in these alkaline complexes is critical for exploration, as HFSE mineralization is either hosted by the ultramafic rocks or the carbonatites.

Simon Hector (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, KIT) and his co-authors analyzed four Au deposits with varying base metal content in their paper “Orogenic Au deposits with atypical metal association (Cu, Co, Ni): Insights from the Pohjanmaa Belt, western Finland” published in Ore Geology Reviews. The open-access paper can be found here. These orogenic Au deposits are typically epigenetic, hosted in greenstone belts and usually only contain Au as a commodity but some show economic enrichments of Co, Ni, and Cu. These deposits are then called orogenic Au deposits with atypical metal associations. The occurrence of both, Au deposits with and without atypical metal association, within the same geological structures raises questions regarding the relative timing of the mineralization and the source and nature of the fluid. Simon analyzed a big set of samples from the four deposits and investigated the mineralogy by microscopy (including transmitted and reflected light), SEM, and EPMA. Additionally, he studied the sulfur isotopes of monomineralic powders of sulfides within the samples. The evaluation of the data showed that there were multiple successive mineralizing events of which two are the main Au mineralizing events. The first event is related to the peak metamorphism in which Au occurs in arsenides (invisible gold) or as inclusion in arsenopyrites. The formation temperatures are between 620 and 430°C and this event can further bring in Co and Ni. The later fluid event can form Cu (-Au) rich sulfide and is related to the retrograde overprint. Here, the Au occurs as free, native grains. The relative intensity of each mineralizing event is then responsible for the occurrence of either Au or Au-Cu, Au-Co, and Au-Cu-Co deposits. Altough these atypical Au deposits are sometimes classified as porphyry copper deposits overprinted by orogenic Au mineralization, Simon showed that the results of his study are not consistent with features observed in porphyries, especially as the Cu mineralizing event postdates the Au-As formation.

Jia Chang (University of Bayreuth) published his results regarding the “Post-subduction porphyry Cu magmas in the Sanjiang region of southwestern China formed by fractionation of lithospheric mantle-derived mafic magmas” in Geology. In his paper, he replaces the popular model that post-subduction porphyries are formed by partial melting of lower crustal cumulates with a new model in which these deposits are formed by fractionation of mafic magmas derived from the subduction-modified lithospheric mantle. This can also explain the K-rich nature of these porphyries whereas arc cumulates and derived partial melts are K-poor. He undertook an invasive petrographic study and produced new Nd-Sr isotopic and trace element data from xenoliths with varying degrees of metasomatism. He and his co-author display the measured trace element contents (especially La/Yb) and link those to the collision front. It becomes clear that although the La/Yb ratios are constant over the mafic to felsic interval at one location, the ratio increases with distance to the collision front in the analyzed mafic, intermediate, and felsic rocks. Therefore, the post-subduction porphyries are more likely to directly derive from the associated mafic magmas. Furthermore, the constant values in individual magma systems points against the crustal melting model as different degrees of partial melting would also result in highly variable La/Yb ratios which are not observed.

Jan Falkenberg from the GeoZentrumNordbayern published his next paper regarding the "Spatial Variations in Magmatic Volatile Influx and Fluid Boiling in the Submarine Hydrothermal Systems of Niuatahi Caldera, Tonga Rear-Arc" in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. His open access article can be found at here. It shows really well that seafloor mineralization (e.g., black smokers) with different compositions can occur at hot springs at submarine caldera volcanoes associated with volcanic cones or the caldera wall. The effect of boiling fluids and the addition of magmatic gases results in local differences in the metal budget in the related hydrothermal sulfide minerals, which are poorly constrained. The Niuatahi volcano in the western Pacific is such an example, where four different hot springs are discharging up to 334°C hot fluids with variable salt and metal contents. The trace element and isotope composition of hydrothermal sulfide minerals agree with the hot fluid composition and indicate that fluid boiling at the caldera center is a common process, alongside the influx of magmatic gases, which drastically enhances the metal budget of the mineralization. By contrast, metal transfer due to magmatic gas is not evident in the hot springs at the northern caldera wall, which is rather controlled by evolved seawater and fluid interaction with the surrounding rocks. The observed chemical variations show that Niuatahi caldera is host to a continuum from magmatic gas-rich to host rock-controlled hydrothermal systems, which ultimately results in seafloor mineralization that exhibit spatially selective trace element enrichments.

Dominik Gudelius, DOME researcher from the University of Tübingen, published his article “Crustal fluids cause strong Lu-Hf fractionation and Hf-Nd-Li isotopic provinciality in the mantle of continental subduction zones” in Geology. The link can be found here. His work shows how the terrestrial element cycles can be better understood via the analysis of various trace elements and their isotopic signature (including Lu-Hf, Li-Nd) in metasomized mantle peridotites. He and his co-authors sampled such peridotites within exhumed high-pressure terranes, like the high-grade gneisses of the Ulten Zone in the Alps (see figure for an overview of the diverse peridotite structures). This work shows really well the complexity, the sensitivity and the various links of the isotopic distribution to the undergone fluid-rock interaction and the mineralogical reactions. These reactions are responsible for a variety of element losses/gains including heavy rare earth element loss (HREE), high field strength element (HFSE) addition and light rare earth element fractionation. The authors suggest that the observed heterogeneity in the peridotites of the Ulten Zone are caused by their different position relative to the crustal fluid source.

Maximilian Korges and his co-authors showed in their study the mineralogical change of the Merensky Reef, Eastern Bushveld, South Africa during weathering processes. The supergene processes resulted in an invasive change of the mineralogy of the Merensky Reef, including the PGM (platin group minerals). Whole-rock geochemistry data showed the (still) high contents of PGE (platinum group elements), similar to the content in pristine samples of the Merensky Reef. However, the processing of this supergene ore is uneconomic. Therefore, Korges et al. investigated the mineralogical sitting of the PGE as there are ca. hundreds of million tonnes of supergene ore worldwide than cannot be processed using conventional methods although showing this high PGE contents. It became clear that the distribution of PGE within the supergene ores change from bimodal in the pristine to a polymodal distribution. PGE in the pristine ores are mainly detectable as discrete minerals (PGM) mostly attached to sulfides and further within the crystal structure of sulfides (mainly Pd in pentlandite). In the supergene, they found relict PGM and "neoformation" (typically alloys) which were not present in the pristine samples. Further, relict sulfides as well as their weathering product (e.g. Fe-hydroxides) can still contain high grades of Pd. Further, some hydro-silicates can show elevated contents of PGE although the mineralogical sitting within silicates remains unclear. In the end, the microscopical investigation and the lack of, especially, Pt detected in the secondary phases and/or as PGM suggest the formation of submicrometer/nanometer-sized Pt minerals during weathering which have to be processed via whole-rock leaching processes.

Julie Michaud (DOME researcher at the University of Hannover) published an article in Constributions to Mineralogy and Petrology . She and her co-authors decribe the behavior of different rare elements in peraluminous granites wih several experiments. Here you can find the abstract of the article.

Experiments were conducted to explore the behavior of Li, Rb, Nb, Sn, Cs, Ta, W during crustal melting and test the anatectic origin of rare metal-bearing peraluminous granites such as rare metal granites (RMGs). The experiments were performed under fluid-absent conditions at 800 and 850 °C, 400 MPa and moderately reducing fO2 (ΔFMQ = − 0.5 to − 0.8). Starting materials were cores of several millimetres drilled from two natural rocks, a biotite-rich paragneiss (Pg) and a muscoviterich orthogneiss (Og) enriched in Li, Be, Sn, Cs, W. Both protoliths produced small melt fractions from 8 to 20% vol. Melt distributions were either homogeneously distributed at grain boundaries in the Pg or preferentially associated with muscovite reaction zones in the Og. In the Pg at 800 °C, melting is mainly fluid present, driven by interstitial water at grain boundaries. At 850 °C, biotite dehydration-melting produces peritectic orthopyroxene, hercynitic spinel, ilmenite and alkali feldspar in addition to melt. In the Og, muscovite dehydration-melting generates melt plus peritectic biotite, hercynitic spinel, ilmenite, Al silicates and alkali feldspar. Experimental glasses are nearly homogeneous, silica rich, peraluminous and leucogranitic and their major element compositions differ only little between the two protoliths. In contrast, the trace element concentrations vary as a consequence of chemical and textural heterogeneities in our starting materials. Compared with source rocks, the Og glasses are enriched in Rb, Nb, Ta, W and depleted in Li, Cs and the Pg are enriched in Li, Rb, Cs, W and depleted in Nb, Ta. Mass-balance calculations indicate that during muscovite dehydration-melting, Li, Cs and Rb partition into the melt; whereas Nb, Ta and W are preferentially incorporated in peritectic phases. Li and Cs also partition toward the melt during biotite dehydration-melting. The partitioning behavior of trace elements during crustal melting is a function of the melting reaction and partition coefficients between melt, residual and peritectic phases. Experimental glasses are similar to peraluminous muscovite granites but fail to reproduce RMG compositions. Alternatives to mica dehydration-melting such as fluid-present and residual source melting emphasize the difficulties with an origin of RMGs by purely anatectic processes. Crystallization differentiation might have to be combined with mica dehydration-melting to explain the distinctive geochemical features of RMGs.

Jan Falkenberg (DOME researcher at the GeoZentrum Nordbayern) published an article about the "Effects of fluid boiling on Au and volatile element enrichment in submarine arc-related hydrothermal systems". Jan and his co-authors analyzed samples from the black-smoker chimneys and conclude from their bulk sulfide-sulfate, isotope and microanalytical data that volatile (e.g., As, Sb, Se, Te), and precious (Au) element enrichment in submarine arc-related hydrothermal systems can be decoupled from a magmatic volatile influx and is instead a result of boiling-induced trace element fractionation. Here the abstract of the paper:

Shallow (<1500 mbsl) submarine arc-related hydrothermal systems can host base (Cu), precious (Au) and volatile elements (As, Se, Sb, Te, Tl) in significant quantities. Their wide application in the high-tech industry, but a potential eco-toxicological footprint gives them a strategic importance. However, the processes that concentrate these elements in submarine arc-related hydrothermal systems, compared to their mid-ocean ridge counterparts are still debated, and it is unclear whether boilingrelated processes and/or the contribution of magmatic volatiles are key for their enrichment.

We present bulk sulfide-sulfate, isotope (S and Pb), and high-resolution microanalytical data of hydrothermal sulfides from the Niua South fore-arc volcano in north Tonga, where numerous black-smoker type sulfide-sulfate chimneys emit boiling fluids with temperatures (up to 325 _C) near the seawater boiling curve at ~1170 m water depth. Hence, this system represents an ideal natural laboratory to investigate the effect of fluid boiling on base, precious, and volatile element enrichment associated with hydrothermal seafloor mineralization. At Niua South, textural and chemical variations of multiple pyrite (framboidal, euhedral and massive), chalcopyrite (linings), and sphalerite (dendrites and linings) generations are indicative for sulfide precipitation from early low-temperature (~240 _C) fluids that underwent abundant mixing with ambient seawater (low Se/Tl and Co/Ni ratios in pyrite) and from later high-temperature (up to 325 _C) (high Se/Tl and Co/Ni ratios in pyrite). In addition, crustiform inclusion-rich pyrite that precipitated from high-temperature boiling fluids shows low Bi/Pb, Tl/Pb and Sb/Pb ratios due to volatile element loss (e.g., Tl and Sb) to the vapor phase compared to pyrite that formed during the low temperature stage. By contrast, late sphalerite (~280 _C) is enriched in elements with an affinity to Cl-complexes like Mn, Co, Ni, Ga, Cd, In, and Sn, and therefore precipitated from the corresponding Cl-rich liquid phase.

Gold occurs in solid-solution and as boiling-induced particles of native Au, electrum, and Au-rich Bi-tellurides in pyrite (up to 144 ppm Au), sphalerite (up to 60 ppm Au), and chalcopyrite (up to 37 ppm Au). These particles (<5–10 mm) probably formed during fluid boiling causing an extreme Au enrichment (>30 ppm) in the mature and late stage of chimney formation. Lead isotope data indicate that the hydrothermal fluids scavenged metals not only from the deeper basement in the reaction zone (20–40%), but also from young dacitic volcanic rocks near the seafloor in the upflow zone (60–80%). Sulfur isotope (d34S = _0.3 to 4.4‰) and Se/S*106 values (<1500) of hydrothermal sulfides provide no evidence for a magmatic volatile influx and indicate that S, and most metals and semi-metals were likely leached from the host rocks. Hence, volatile (As, Se, Sb, Te, Tl), and precious (Au) element enrichments in arc-related submarine hydrothermal systems can be decoupled from magmatic volatiles and are instead a result of boiling-induced trace element fractionation – a hydrothermal enrichment process, which has been underestimated to date.

An international team of scientists with participation of Dr. Maria Kokh from one of the DOME projects was able to elucidate the mystery of ‘invisible’ gold enriched in sulfide minerals. Their results were recently published in the journal Geochemical Perspectives Letters.

To form an ore deposit, gold needs to be concentrated from a thousand up to a million times more than its average abundance in the Earth's crust (which is only about 1 mg per ton of rock). In nature, only very few minerals, namely the sulfides arsenian pyrite and arsenopyrite, are known to present such enrichment factors for gold. However, despite the enormous implications for ore deposits, the state of this ‘invisible' gold and the cause of its entrapment in these sulfides remain one of the greatest mysteries in the history of the study of ore deposits. An international interdisciplinary consortium of scientists has now shown the exact nature of this invisible gold incorporated by these minerals and revealed the fundamental mechanism that drives these ‘mineral pumps’ at the atomic-scale.

By combining high-resolution experiments – carried out at the European Synchrotron facility (ESRF) – and physical-chemical modeling, the team has discovered that gold enters these minerals with a formal oxidation state of +2. This is made possible by the occurrence of a redox reaction between the fluid and mineral that allows binding gold to arsenic, leading to the formation of the atomic cluster AuAsnS6-n in the mineral structure (Image). This universal gold-arsenic coupling mechanism explains how these iron sulfides can massively capture gold and release it later, controlling both concentration and distribution of gold in different types of hydrothermal deposits. This novel conceptual model opens perspectives for finding new sources of gold and other precious and critical metals hidden in iron sulfide minerals, and for improving the processing and recycling of metal ores for our ‘metal-hungry’ society.

Link to Publication: G.S. Pokrovski, C. Escoda, M. Blanchard, D. Testemale, J-L. Hazemann, S. Gouy, M.A. Kokh, M-C. Boiron, F. de Parseval, T. Aigouy, L. Menjot, P. de Parseval, O. Proux, M. Rovezzi, D. Béziat, S. Salvi, K. Kouzmanov, T. Bartsch, R. Pöttgen, T. Doert (2021) An arsenic-driven pump for invisible gold in hydrothermal systems. Geochemical Perspectives Letters (2021) 17, 39-44, https://doi.org/10.7185/geochemlet.2112