You are using an old browser with security vulnerabilities and can not use the features of this website.
Department of Constitutional Law
Law Faculty of Palacky University in Olomouc
Postgraduate studentDepartment of Constitutional LawLaw Faculty of Palacky University in OlomoucCzech RepublicIn general, my research deals with various aspects of proportionality, which represents the basic methodological approach towards constitutional rights adjudication.My doctoral research project has two main parts, the first one is qualitative and the second one is quantitative (empirical). The qualitative part consists of a comparative study of German, Canadian and South African theory and practice. From this study I draw basic hypotheses to be tested in the empirical part. The main goal of the empirical part represents the inquiry of mutual interconnection between necessity stage and the balancing stage of the proportionality analysis in the practice of the Czech Constitutional Court, which determines the intensity of review.Nowadays I am also working on a paper for the ICON.S Conference, June 17–19, 2016, Berlin. In this paper I address the million-dollar question raised in current doctrinal works concerning the applicability of proportionality to positive obligations and to socio-economic rights. I am trying to prove that proportionality in its full-extent (especially as regards the necessity stage) is not the most suitable method to review interferences in socio-economic rights, but the balancing stage must be upheld in the decision-making of courts even in the cases concerning socio-economic rights. I would like to demonstrate that the absence of balancing in review of constitutionality decreases the protection of individual’s fundamental rights. Limitation of review to mere means-ends analysis leaves out the individuals and intensity of interferences in their fundamental rights. Balancing must therefore be maintained even in the case of socio-economic rights.